Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigersEye

I think that is a given. The nuke would be simply for getting the caldera to blow.


53 posted on 02/25/2023 7:53:13 PM PST by MarMema (Orange Putin Bad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: MarMema

The ones making the threat were the ones highlighting it as a “radioactive eruption.”

In reality I don’t think any amount of nukes would make the caldera blow. There are already loads of conduits to the surface (geysers, hot springs, pools) so trying to create another with explosives would be useless. A path to the surface is not what is lacking.

It won’t blow until something from below makes the magma chamber swell to an unstable state.


55 posted on 02/25/2023 8:02:00 PM PST by TigersEye (The Democrat Party is criminal, unAmerican and illegitimate )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: MarMema

You are off (size of nuke needed) by a couple orders of magnitude.

... Unless she’s ready to blow anyway.


92 posted on 02/26/2023 11:34:56 PM PST by Paul R. (You know your pullets are dumb if they don't recognize a half Whopper as food!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson