“...full communion...”
__________
No such term.
One is either in communion, or not. No partial communion.
The noted term appears to have been minted to suggest that certain lay Catholics or certain priests or prelates are quasi-Catholic due to the same are not having professed themselves to be enamored of, or not consider themselves dogmatically bound by the admittedly merely pastoral guidance uttered by the 1960s council commonly referred to as Vatican II.
One is either in communion, or not. No partial communion.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.
Not so, because anyone who is denied reception of any of the Sacraments but who is not officially excommunicated is no longer in full communion.
Those who set out to use the term “full communion” should be aware that it appears to have been minted in the context of a document on ecumenism that came out of the Vatican II council, and that the definition of the term therein accorded necessarily excludes the SSPX!:
Vatican II proves SSPX in FULL COMMUNION, Condemns Anti-SSPX Pope-splainers
To say that the SSPX is not in ‘full communion’ is to dissent from Vatican II. Not a good look for a pope-splainer
The Kennedy Report
659 Likes
5,739 Views
Oct 25 2022
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5p3YwqvxL-s