Posted on 02/19/2023 3:35:11 PM PST by nickcarraway
When it comes to environmental protection, U.S. government officials seem to consider no lifestyle change too dramatic or costly. The Biden administration wants more electric cars and meat substitutes, an end to gas stoves and petroleum use, and climate reparations in the form of taxpayer-funded payouts to developing nations. Environmentalists celebrated President Joe Biden's recent enhancements of the Clean Water Act, saying they "restored needed clean water protections so that our nation's waters are guarded against pollution."
In almost every case, the Biden administration pursues these changes with no regard for corporate objections. Yet there is one industry that can enjoy government-sanctioned dumping of a potential hazard—and is often spared the requirements of state laws as "a judicially favored industry." That industry is corporate abortion, and the potential hazard is the chemically tainted blood, placenta tissue, and human remains resulting from the use of abortion pills that have been flushed into America's wastewater system for more than 20 years.
First approved for use in the U.S. through negotiations brokered by then-president Bill Clinton in 2000, chemical abortion utilizes two pills to end preborn life. The process can expose women to heightened risks of injury, infertility, and even death. Abusers have slipped women the drugs without their knowledge or consent—a scenario made all the more possible under the no-test online distribution standards enabled by the Biden administration.
SNIP
Showing little regard for women, Biden's team at the FDA ended requirements for all these precautions. Today, Planned Parenthood's sponsored think tank, the Guttmacher Institute, reports more than half of all abortions are committed with chemical abortion pills, always intended to end life on a mass scale.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsweek.com ...
It's timely and great, and the regular Newspeak readers are seething: "MustBlotOutLightNOW!!!"
Recently Marion County Oregon commissioners ruled not to accept fetal material for burning in their incinerator. Yet since Roe vs. Wade 56,000,000 abortions have generated roughly 3.5 million pounds of this medical waste, so how could anyone now object to its disposal?
This ruling came in spite of the Supreme Court decision declaring that all fetuses not viable outside the womb can be extracted. Therefore, before viability removing the fetus must be equivalent to removing any other harmful matter from the human body. When legality provides such moral certitude surely burning this material must be acceptable?
The advances of science over the last forty years should not be a concern. Granted, in an office today one woman may excitedly present the framed ultrasound of the “baby” she and her husband have conceived and already named. Another woman looking on may have recently aborted a fetus more mature that the one depicted. However, doesn’t the legal ruling provide the assurance needed to celebrate both events simultaneously?
I am sure some will raise the allusion to cremating millions of Jews during the Holocaust. However, such misdirected passions must fall before the moral absolute provided to 300 million people by the deliberations of nine brilliant men on the Supreme Court. Surely our intellectual soundness has evolved sufficiently that ancient religions or philosophies should not intrude upon our society and its legal bulwarks?
We Cannot Ignore the Sickening, Evil Depravity of Planned Parenthood (Long Article)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3312329/posts?page=1
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.