[FranklinsTower]

The question that need to be asked under oath:

Exactly what are the earmarks and how were they originally established as earmarks with past solidified documented evidence?

I bet the so called earmarks evidence is very ambiguous and squishy. If so then it shows the intent of these so called intelligence influencers are simply talking out of their political asses.

[Be Free]

"The question that need to be asked under oath: Exactly what are the earmarks and how were they originally established as earmarks with past solidified documented evidence?"

Continuing the theme:

• Who drafted the letter?
• Who recruited the signers?
• Did any of the signatories have any pre-issuance contacts with the Biden campaign or the DNC regarding the letter or its contents?
• Were there people asked to sign, but refused?
• List all individuals or entities to whom the finished/signed letter was distributed to, and when.
• What was the intent of the letter's distribution - particularly to the media - if not to ensure further dissemination and sow doubts about the laptop's authenticity?
• When the letter was misinterpreted by those receiving it, did you communicate with them in order to correct them?
• Knowing now that the laptop is authentic, what do you have to say for yourself and your participation in this conspiracy?