Robert Barnes Retweeted http://Disclose.tv
JUST IN - Pentagon does not know to what keeps these “objects” aloft, unknown propulsion systems.
“We’re calling them objects, not balloons, for a reason,” says U.S. Air Force General Glen VanHerck.
MORE - General VanHerck says that he hasn’t “ruled out anything yet” when asked whether he rules out aliens.
UPDATE - Unnamed U.S. defense official now tells Reuters that there is “no indication of aliens or extraterrestrial activity” in recent takedowns of aerial objects.
Big Serge @witte_sergei
My theory about the airspace closures and intercepts is that the DoD cracked open that first Chinese balloon and found sensory capabilities that really freaked them out, so now they are being hyper-vigilant about any and all radar anomalies.
Letting the public speculate harmlessly about aliens is better than admitting that hostile systems can just waltz in past the radar filtering software.
Time to surrender and form a one world government that will save us all.
Any theories?
Here are some of my own, in order of probability:
1. Spy or weaponized devices, from a foreign power, most likely Russia or China.
2. Domestically created objects, in normal use by black programs that do not share info between agencies. Potential internal wargame as well.
3. Domestically created objects, again by black programs but designed to create an incident, for diversionary or misinformation purposes, such as project bluebeam, or to build distrust of foreign governments.
4. Intra-dimensional or extraterritorial objects.
Have the “51 Intelligence Experts” posited a theory yet?
“Letting the public speculate harmlessly about aliens is better than admitting that hostile systems can just waltz in past the radar filtering software.”
Heads should be rolling over this.
L