Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UK armed forces would last just ‘five days’ in a war, senior MP warns
Financial times ^ | 2/11/23 | George Parker and John-Paul Rathbone

Posted on 02/11/2023 7:35:03 AM PST by JonPreston

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: kenmcg

“Remember Dunkirk! If it weren’t for us they would have been history”,

The United States had nothing to do with Dunkirk.


41 posted on 02/11/2023 10:15:51 AM PST by laplata (They want each crisis to take the greatest toll possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Nextrush
The next POTUS needs to either cut them down to size or expose the British as operators for the US “Deep State” with all this warmongering.

Our influence will eventually wane because we will be too woke.

42 posted on 02/11/2023 10:22:14 AM PST by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: laplata

Re #41. Correct. Dunkirk evacuation was 100% British.


43 posted on 02/11/2023 10:34:54 AM PST by DownInFlames (P)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: laplata; kenmcg

> The United States had nothing to do with Dunkirk. <

Right. What really saved the British at Dunkirk was the heroic delaying action of the outnumbered French First Army at Lille. Surrender monkeys? I think not.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Lille_(1940)


44 posted on 02/11/2023 10:43:33 AM PST by Leaning Right (The steal is real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

Correct.

And the Panzers were halted to re-fit and rest.


45 posted on 02/11/2023 10:58:09 AM PST by laplata (They want each crisis to take the greatest toll possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

What does he know he’s only a Member of Parliament


46 posted on 02/11/2023 11:45:20 AM PST by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

And the thing is, whenever you bring this up, the response is “sink a carrier, we incinerate 200 million women and children”.

This is complete nonsense. Sinking a military target in the open ocean with zero collateral damage is NOT going to cause nuclear retaliation.

NOT.


47 posted on 02/11/2023 12:07:05 PM PST by Jim Noble (You have sat too long for any good you have been doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

“Sinking a military target in the open ocean with zero collateral damage is NOT going to cause nuclear retaliation.”

Agreed.

Our weakness is dangerous, though, because it encourages attacks and increases the risk of nuclear conflict.

Our woke military is not just dangerous for us, it is dangerous for the entire world.


48 posted on 02/11/2023 12:11:42 PM PST by cgbg (Claiming that laws and regs that limit “hate speech” stop freedom of speech is “hate speech”.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston
UK armed forces would last just ‘five days’ in a war

Ours' probably won't last much longer, but at least we'll go down being WOKE.

49 posted on 02/11/2023 12:30:10 PM PST by The Sons of Liberty (Ultra MAGA in Biden's Post Constitutional United Socialist States of Amerika!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salohcin
If NATO is in such bad shape, then Putin had no credible fear that NATO would use Ukraine to invade Russia.

It's a really bad time for you neocons to be exposed to the inept NATO Alliance. Right when you need them most. K Sarah Sarah!

Yes, Russia and most of the rest of the world see it as well.

50 posted on 02/11/2023 12:44:49 PM PST by BlackbirdSST (Trump WON!!! He will win 2024!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; The Sons of Liberty

“Chinx would sink all our large ships within 36 hours with their standoff missiles. Aircraft carriers, destroyers etc sunk or disabled within 36 hours.”

Carrier groups have multiple layers of defenses that can handle Chinese anti-ship missiles, including the SM-6 system, and electronic jamming systems that disrupt the missile’s flight trajectory.


51 posted on 02/11/2023 10:58:19 PM PST by ScottfromNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ScottfromNJ
Carrier groups have multiple layers of defenses that can handle Chinese anti-ship missiles

Let's hope, but I wouldn't bet on it.

52 posted on 02/12/2023 1:17:39 PM PST by The Sons of Liberty (Ultra MAGA in Biden's Post Constitutional United Socialist States of Amerika!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson