Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AustinBill

It’s less about life expectancy and more about the ability to work. Many physical ly demanding jobs are pretty much impossible even in your early sixties. And at 70, many people are not mentally capable for a job much more demanding than a Walmart greeter.

Plus, most of the gains in life expectancy come from reductions in infant mortality. Actual human lifespan has barely changed at all. In all likelihood, your person who died at 80 in 1940 would probably live to be 80.5 today, and that extra six months would be enduring the hell of chemotherapy while the medical industry drains his kids’ inheritance.


96 posted on 02/08/2023 5:43:31 AM PST by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]


To: hopespringseternal
Fair enough, though physical labor intensive jobs were certainly a much larger percentage of the workforce in the 1930s then they are today. And there are plenty of "couch potatoes" in their 30s and 40s who are unfit for any sort of real physical labor today.

While it is true that improvements in infant and childhood mortality were responsible for raising the life expectancy averages beyond age 40 in the past, more recently life expectancy has improved across all age groups. See here for some interesting details.

139 posted on 02/09/2023 11:58:00 AM PST by AustinBill (consequence is what makes our choices real)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson