Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Beowulf9

I was told that the skyscrapers were restricted so as not to obscure the view of the mountains. I am not big on “nature”, but I like a city trying to pay respect to the character of its terrain.

Also, skyscrapers create traffic issues. Phoenix has big city traffic, but nowhere near as bad as Atlanta, Chicago or DC. In fact, it is better often at rush hour even than some small cities like Hartford, and Madison (whose lake makes it impossible to use alternate routes).

People complain about sprawl, but the only alternatives to sprawl are building up (NYC, Chicago), pricing people out of your city (SF), or stagnation and decay (Detroit, Cleveland).


11 posted on 02/08/2023 6:38:14 AM PST by Dr. Sivana (But yet the Son of man, when he cometh, shall he find, think you, faith on earth? (Luke 18:8))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Dr. Sivana

One of the other alternatives to sprawl is not letting a lot of people in from other countries.

Yes, I remember them saying the skyscrapers were restricted in height so as not to obscure the view of the mountains.


12 posted on 02/08/2023 9:01:45 AM PST by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson