It pretends this is 'normal and required science', while it is neither.
The FDA pull a similar stunt when approving the predecessor to the implantable birth control 'Nexplanon' (Norplant).
"The Pill" was/is contraindicated for about 35% of women.
So, when Norplant was contraindicated for 65% of women, they asserted that since the 35% was the approved baseline, that another 30% rejection rate was acceptable!!!!
Not only that, but when women on welfare experienced rejection symptoms, doctors refused to remove the implants. (Even the ACLU objected to this practice.)
After reading “Pfizer’s Response” — what Pfizer claims....
Go read what Dr Malone, Veratas, et. al. is now exposing in this matter.
Pfizer Responses to Veritas Expose
Substack ^ | January 28, 2023 | Robert Malone
https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4126705/posts?page=4
Quite a different view of the matter.
Pretty clever piece of obfuscation there in that statement. We aren't doing gain-of-function research with regards to that drug. We are doing it for future drugs. Who are these cohorts with whom, you are working with? The Chinese at the Wuhan, or some other Chinese, lab?
Google search result message just now:
It looks like the results below are changing quickly
If this topic is new, it can sometimes take time for reliable sources to publish information
Check the source
Are they trusted on this topic?
Come back later
Other sources might have more information on this topic in a few hours or days
It takes time the scrub the net. Even Google can't do that completely. I bet we don't see Jordan Tristan Walker again without a lawyer.
My old bio professor was muttering to himself about leaving for Mars. When I asked him why,he replied,cuz they are learning how to make viruses. He had just attended a seminar dealing with that issue. True story from long time ago.
Pfizer needs to be sued and fined out of existence Criminal charges with life sentences for the financial planners and boffins.