The customer has to be served because the baker is being paid. It shouldn’t matter if the baker likes him or not.
If the baker has a problem, the baker shouldn’t
be in business. Serve everybody or lose your business.
RE: The customer has to be served because the baker is being paid. It shouldn’t matter if the baker likes him or not.
1. The Baker isn’t accepting the customer’s money, therefore is not being paid.
2. The Baker never said he dislikes the customers, he objects to being asked to perform a service that is against his religious convictions.
It is also an exercise of first amendment rights NOT to do service for a group that wants you to use your skills against your personal conscience ( for example, I will not create a printed flyer for a Nazi group or a racist organization like the KKK ).
RE: Serve everybody or lose your business.
NOPE, here should be limits to WHO one wishes to serve.
Religious freedom is the FIRST Amendment in the Bill of Rights for a reason.
As a follow-up to #15 ...
If two kwheers enter Jack’s store and ask for a cake that says ‘Happy Birthday’ on top, I have no doubt that the cake would be made. It is the message on the product that is the issue, not the status of the requesting parties.
While I understand that the LGBTQetc community is trying to impose their hedonistic style on our society as a whole, as a judge in the trial the first question I would ask is “Is there another bakery within a reasonable distance from Jacks?” If there is, case dismissed with prejudice.
So a heil hitler cake is okay and a Jewish baker must bake that cake
Right, got ya