[MattMusson]

World War Three much?

[OKSooner]

Oh, that's already a done deal when the American, British, and German tanks show up, which are all more difficult to destroy than the Russian-made tanks Ukraine was stuck with.

When they move on the Russians in combined arms formation, that's when we'll find out what Russian tactical nuke doctrine is.

[ZOOKER]

World War Three much?

Instantly my mind went to the Cuban Missile Crisis.

Isn't this what Kruschev attempted to do to us - give his ally (Cuba) missiles to strike within our borders? Granted, Zelensky doesn't have nuclear warheads for them, but he has everything he needs to make dirty bombs, and all in-country.

Kennedy wouldn't stand for that, why would Putin?

[Greetings_Puny_Humans]

World War Three much?

The dummies have been saying this for a long time, but we've already stomped all over all of Putin's red lines, who recently stated that Russia will never use nuclear weapons unless nuclear weapons are used on Russia first.

IOW, Russia went from talking about nuking the UK, Germany, Poland, the USA, etc., threatening "consequences never before seen in history" if such and such weapon systems is given to Ukraine, only for them to fold each time.

The whole "WW3 is going to start!" excuse for traitors behaving like traitors has been thoroughly discredited.