The armorer is the most guilty. She was the ultimate person hired specifically to handle the weapons. If she did her job properly, there would have been nothing in the gun at that point in time. She gave her official ok to that weapon.
Her consequences are great, but her level of participation in the crime are lower, thus lower charges.
You can only charge an appropriate charge in the window of the time frame of their responsibility.
“ The armorer is the most guilty. “
I agree — what is an actor supposed to know about the specifics of the firearm that the Armorer doesn’t?
Isn’t the Armorer’s reason for having employment on the movie set be that he/she is the Expert on these matters?
My guess is that Baldwin heard at least 100 times in his life that if you point a gun at somebody.... YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE or WHATEVER HAPPENS !!!!!!
I agree that the armorer is also guilty as hell. There should not have been a live round within a hundred fn miles of the movie set much less IN THE GUN! Jeez!
But, the democrats will let him go. That said, it will be fun to see Baldwin in cuffs and a orange jump suit being led to jail by a 90lb female officer. Never liked the guy.