Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BobL
Arden will have the legacy of, once and for all, PROVING that women as leaders, are more dictatorial and war mongering than men.

The sample pool is rather small. In modern history, you have Golda Meir and Margaret Thatcher. I'll love to fight for them. That said, I would rather vote for a male leader. They're less emotional. More rational. Even though some of them are tyrants (Vladimir Putin, Xi Jinping, and a few others who are dictators right now)

20 posted on 02/03/2023 5:43:46 PM PST by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: MinorityRepublican

Even of the two that you name, Golda nearly lost her country due to not taking the threat seriously enough (another common weakness), while Thatcher seemed to be about perfect, as far as I can tell.

Historically, of course, there has been no shortage of evil men, but also tons of great men. But maybe it’s today’s ‘liberated’, ‘can do it all’, type women, but many they are something. Skunk Cabbage was ready to start WW3 with Russia had she won in 2016, Neuland simply cannot let go of her Ukrainian past...a blood feud to her. And then the lockdowns, with the worst being New Zealand and Canada (I consider Trudeau to be a woman). Now it’s women running Europe and they’ve made a TOTAL MESS of things there, with their emotional reaction to Russia, with Orban, one of the few real men running a country, about the only sane person.

Oh well, it’s tough to turn the clock back, but that may well be what happens, unless some men step up and put an end to the Ukraine crap that the women got us into.


21 posted on 02/03/2023 10:27:47 PM PST by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson