Interesting but I think the salient point is that the vax crippled her.
Well that’s one way to skip out on payments
If I am understanding the poorly told story, the couple’s children are now 17 and 18 y/o. Why would there be any further maintenance of their ‘children’ at all, once the youngest becomes 18? They are grown, now. The Dad will have to find some other way to improve his personal life style.
How could any judge be aware of this poor woman’s condition, then say that she must keep on paying, when she can’t even stand up independantly or speak properly? It’s like early onset Parkinsons!
What a low skunk of an ex-husband to go after her like this.
These adult chidren may not be able to go to college, at least not now. Perhaps they can try for some special scholarhsip. Or just get a damn job locally, and stop complaining about what Mommy won’t do for you anymore.
“Child maintenance”?
Is that like checking the oil and changing as needed?