Posted on 01/13/2023 9:58:29 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Social Security Trust Funds have squandered billions of dollars on an antiquated investment policy.
That loss tells us a lot about the financial crisis coming to Social Security.
In 2019, Social Security lost roughly $1 billion because the system invests the excess reserves on exactly the wrong minute of the year. Any other day or any minute early in the day, saves the program money.
It is 2023, and the beat goes on. Over the course of 2022, Social Security redeemed more than $100 billion in high-yield debt, and lost nearly $5 billion in interest earnings in the process. The program just gave it away.
Here is the problem: Social Security generally needs cash to pay its bills in the back half of the year. Unfortunately, the program locks up all its loose cash on June 30. So, starting July 1, the program needs to redeem bonds, and the Treasury Department picks the wrong bonds for redemption based on a policy that literally dates back to the era of black-and-white TV.
To illustrate, in November, Social Security needed extra cash to pay the bills, and redeemed nearly $100 billion in bonds at par, which earned 4 percent interest. At the same time, it kept bonds that pay less than 1 percent on the books. Given the process, the program lost nearly $2 billion in interest.
For those so inclined to look at the loss in terms of math: 95.7B * (4-.075) * 7/12 months = a lot of money that has been simply thrown away. This is not terribly different from someone spending $1,000 on ATM fees.
This underlying problem was identified more than 20 years ago. Yet, nothing has been done about it since then. The solution is not terribly difficult.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
How about the SS fund be allowed to invest in other things besides US Treasuries? It could be invested in many mutual funds spread across many asset classes.
No. Take the King’s shilling, do the King’s bidding.
Yup!
Thanks RACPE.
...the program locks up all its loose cash on June 30. So, starting July 1, the program needs to redeem bonds, and the Treasury Department picks the wrong bonds for redemption based on a policy that literally dates back to the era of black-and-white TV.
Gosh, it's almost as if the rest of the gubmint is setting the policy to benefit the rest of the gubmint, knowing that no one will oppose a later, "necessary" increase in the FICA rate.
Percentages don't mean much, total amount of the payout to each system is the only thing that matters to me. Maybe one is way bigger than the other maybe not.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.