Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Does the Science Say? | Dr. Richard Lindzen |
Watts Up With That ^ | 1/9/23 | Jordan Peterson

Posted on 01/11/2023 8:48:17 AM PST by Renkluaf

Dr Jordan B Peterson and Dr. Richard Lindzen dive into the facts of climate change, the models used to predict it, the dismal state of academia, and the politicized world of “professional” science.

Richard Lindzen is a dynamical meteorologist. He has contributed to the development of theories for the Hadley Circulation, hydrodynamic instability theory, internal gravity waves, atmospheric tides, and the quasi-biennial oscillation of the stratosphere. His current research is focused on climate sensitivity, the role of cirrus clouds in climate, and the determination of the tropics-to-pole temperature difference. He has attained multiple degrees from Harvard University, and won multiple awards in his field of study such as the Jule Charney award for “highly significant research in the atmospheric sciences”. Between 1983 and 2013, he was the Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Atmospheric Sciences at MIT where he earned emeritus status in July of 2013.

(Excerpt) Read more at wattsupwiththat.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
The video is long but well worth the time.
1 posted on 01/11/2023 8:48:17 AM PST by Renkluaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Renkluaf

In an interview with Larry King many years ago Lindzen compared climate change alarmist to little kids who sit in a dark closet just to scare themselves...


2 posted on 01/11/2023 8:50:41 AM PST by MichaelRDanger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renkluaf

Academia and the media MUST, by order of their assigned roles, IGNORE respected scientists that don’t preach a latest scientific orthodxy. The is very much a Leftist centric phenomena.

Before the Leftist gained near full control of academia and the media it was THEIR constant academic and public refrain that academic, government and media orthodoxies MUST BE rigorously questioned. Their objective was intellectually dishonest. They were not truly for full free inquiry, full academic freedom, full right for overyone to question dominant views in academia, the media and gpvernment. No, their objective was very limited. They just wanted, and demanded, space to move their point of view across. But once they dominated any field, then their objective become clear - to shut off any views not their own.


3 posted on 01/11/2023 9:01:26 AM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renkluaf

Can you give us a quick synopsis?


4 posted on 01/11/2023 9:36:30 AM PST by Nifster (OI see puppy dogs in the clouds )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renkluaf
quasi-biennial oscillation of the stratosphere

That sounds made up. Climate change is settled science graft.

5 posted on 01/11/2023 10:01:00 AM PST by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

The science doesn’t say what the pols & the eco-freaks say it does.


6 posted on 01/11/2023 10:53:44 AM PST by Renkluaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Renkluaf

Bookmark


7 posted on 01/11/2023 11:11:51 AM PST by aquila48 (Do not let them make you "care" ! Guilting you is how thery control you. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson