[mo]

it just doesn’t appear , that after multitudes of suits in multiple states and courts, that the judiciary is going to remedy the problem

its boots on the ground getting in their faces, about cleaning out the the corruption on a precinct by precinct level and about electing legislators that will enact laws protecting their constituents from disenfranchisement of their vote.

the problem is that after decades of neglect, many states have such poor legislative protections of the civil rights of their voters votes that the courts really have “nothing”to rule on

[rodguy911]

Cleansing voter fraud won't be easy.Like you say it's not just one thing. Not just getting to the right judge. Although we have to do everything we can to get rid of corrupt Judges. Once they know we will go after their asses by impeachment or whatever it takes they just might clean up you never know.

Aside from judges you have a myriad of issues in the voter fraud menu.

You have the 2000 mules fiasco,the Runbeck printers who deal so dirty they have to be thrown in jail. The electronic fraud from dominion and so many others. Running ballots twice. It's endless what they do. there are at a minimum some 25-30 issues we need to be on top of 24/7. We have to get serious about voter fraud. It's all about saving the country. That's the only way to look at it.

[rodguy911]

Big precincts are the problem.If no precinct had more than 2,000 voters its easy to control,easy to count and none of the problems the left has created would be viable. Just go French with the paper ballots and everyone voting on a Tuesday make it a day off for everyone.
If we simplified it that much the fraud would become much higher on the electronic side which is not as easy to hide as the dirty dems thought it would be.We can find it and stop it before its allocated.Small precincts with paper ballots easy to count would greatly stall an electronic steal.