This post surely incites violence and should immediately be censored by FR with guidance from the FBI.
The public must be drugged to prevent abuses like this event from history. /sarc
Posted on 12/25/2022 6:15:30 AM PST by Lazamataz
The only way these people will be punished is if the public acts.
She lied in the sense that she first said she had not heard about it, and later admitted she had.
Da ho be blaming her perjury on Trump and his lawyer?! It’s a sick world out there Charlie Brown.
Lol it still doesnt matter if Trump lunged at a driver . He was pissed and he had a right to be pissed. I still dont know why it was ever even an issue…. Much like rest of the “investigation”.
Don’t know you well, but have admired you from afar for a long time.
Merry Christmas, Laz!
Stefan Passantino was the Trump lawyer’s name.
LAZ-—You might regret it. SHE LIES.
"I only hire the best!"
Passantino was Trump's top ethics lawyer in the White House.
Her testi”money” was fake but accurate. Just ask Dan.
This post surely incites violence and should immediately be censored by FR with guidance from the FBI.
The public must be drugged to prevent abuses like this event from history. /sarc
Lied in a deposition. When is the trial?
Lock her up.
Do you think the advice he gave was unethical?
She lied under oath to congress. A felony, and the Department of “No Justice” does nothing.
Hey Laz, how was it on on a scale of -100 to +100. Hillary = -100, Sophia Lauren at 35 = +100.
PS
Merry Christmas and keep on posting. You always bring a smile to our faces.
Cassidy Hutchinson says she
initially lied .
/\
Cassidy, you misspelled
” committed perjury “.
Spit.
Oh.
I forgot.
Not under oath.
How convenient.
Spit.
I believe the story, except the part about Trump overpowering 3 Secret service agents, I heard it was 5.
https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/criminal-defense/what-are-the-penalties-for-lying-to-congress/
…Under the United States Code, title 18, section 1001, a person who knowingly or willingly makes a material statement that is false, or fraudulent, to the feds, is guilty of a crime.
What comes as a surprise to many is that unlike section 1621, section 1001 does not require that a person be under oath...
She might be passable once you spatula all the plaster off her face.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.