Skip to comments.The Heirs of a Jewish Banker are Taking a Japanese Company to Court over an Allegedly Nazi-Looted Van Gogh
Posted on 12/19/2022 3:32:27 PM PST by nickcarraway
The legal heirs of a German Jewish banker who was forced to sell his art collection to avoid persecution by the Nazis are suing a Japanese holding company to reclaim ownership of a painting by Vincent van Gogh.
Three heirs of Paul von Mendelssohn-Bartholdy, based in New York and Germany, filed a lawsuit on December 13 in an Illinois district court against Sompo Holdings, an insurance company based in Japan, to dispute its legal title to the painting Sunflowers (1888).
The claim states that Mendelssohn-Bartholdy was a “casualty” of Nazi-era policies and economic sanctions that forced him to sell his collection, which included works by Pablo Picasso, Claude Monet and August Renoir, among others, in the mid-1930s. He sold the van Gogh painting in 1934.
Mendelssohn-Bartholdy’s descendants allege that Sompo Holdings “ignored” and was “recklessly indifferent” to the painting’s provenance when it was sold in the late 1980s at public auction. Sho Tanka, a spokesperson for Sompo told Courthouse News that the company “categorically denies” the allegations made in the 98-page complaint.
Sompo’s former iteration, Yasuda Fire & Marine Insurance Company, acquired the van Gogh from at a Christie’s auction in London for $39.9 million in 1987. The painting has been on loan to the Sompo Museum of Fine Art in Tokyo since its purchase.
The sale occurred nearly a decade before the declaration of the 1998 Washington Principles on Nazi-Confiscated Art, the current standard around returning and researching artwork linked to Nazi activity, were officially adopted by leading auction houses.
“a German Jewish banker who was forced to sell his art collection to avoid persecution by the Nazis”
Presumedly he sold it before fleeing because he was afraid he wouldn’t be allowed to take it with him. But he apparently received whatever value it was worth at the time since it was auctioned at Christi’s (it wasn’t confiscated by the Nazis) so how do the heirs think it should be given to them?
He didn’t receive the value it was worth at the time, you pinhead. He received what Goering felt like paying that day, which was a tiny fraction of its real value.
The smell of money gets em every time.
I misread the article, I assumed he sold it to Christi’s, but I guess it had changed hands one or more times before reaching them.
Go to stormfront.
The Nazi’s took it, kept it, and their heirs sold it.
I guess the truth hurts.
The truth is always anti-Semitic or racist. I suppose you don’t notice the extremely high black-on-white crime rate either.
YOur posting history makes your antisemitism clear. Man up
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.