Posted on 12/19/2022 8:01:56 AM PST by elpadre
Governments have learnt that fear works – and that is truly terrifying
We have returned to the world of Galileo vs the Vatican. Scientific dissidents are again silenced and ostracised for their opinions
As the year in which life officially returned to normal comes to an end, we must ask an uncomfortable question. What on earth just happened? We have lived through a period of what would once have been the unthinkable suspension of basic freedoms: interventions by the state into personal life that even most totalitarian governments would not have dared to impose. And we, along with most (not all) of the democratic societies of the West, accepted it. Before that era slips into the fog of convenient forgetfulness, it is absolutely imperative that we – the country as a whole – hold a thorough post hoc examination, because our governing classes have certainly learnt something they will remember.
The critical lesson that has been indelibly absorbed by people in power, and those who advise them, is that fear works. There is, it turns out, almost nothing that a population (even one as brave and insouciant as Britain’s) will not give up if they are systematically, relentlessly frightened.
The Covid phenomenon has provided an invaluable training session in public mind-control techniques: the formula was refined – with the assistance of sophisticated advertising and opinion-forming advice – to an astonishingly successful blend of mass anxiety (your life is in danger) and moral coercion (you are putting other people’s lives in danger). But it was not just the endless repetition of that message that accomplished the almost universal, and quite unexpected, compliance. It was the comprehensive suppression of dissent even when it came from expert sources – and the prohibition on argument even when it was accompanied by counter-evidence – that
(Excerpt) Read more at theautomaticearth.com ...
We have lived through a period of what would once have been the unthinkable suspension of basic freedoms: interventions by the state into personal life.
History repeating self by lesson not learned who you vote for means a lot but many never learn why.
Propaganda does work on to many
Although Kepler urged Galileo to validate his elliptical hypothesis, Galileo was a better experimenter and observer than analyst. In fact is it likely that Galileo could not calculate planetary positions using Copernican or Ptolemaic models. Owen Gingerich, in The Eye of Heaven: Ptolemy, Copernicus, Kepler shows convincingly that the Copernican model was no more accurate than the Ptolemaic model in predicting the position of planets or explaining their observed positions. Both were occasionally months off in predicting retrograde motion, and had roughly equal RMS errors in position. The advantage of the Ptolemaic model was that is was much simpler to use, requiring fewer calculations, and fewer parameters to model. The one advantage of the Copernican model was that it did not require the distance to the moon to change by a factor of two in the course of month, a phenomenon not observed, as the angular diameter of the moon only changes by few percent. A further perceived advantage of the Copernican model was that it resolved planetary motion into a combination of uniform circular motions, at the expense of simplicity. Ptolemy accounted for the effect of Kepler's second law by introduction of the much hated equant, which violated Aristotle's injunction that planetary motion must be resolved into uniform circular motions. This is an aesthetic consideration, not a scientific one. The Keplerian model was distinctly more accurate, but required solving a transcendental equation, at time when only a handful of mathematicians even knew how solve polynomial equations higher than quadratic.
Where Galileo got into trouble with the church is with the publication of Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems. Pope Urban VIII had been a friend of Galileo's and reviewed a draft of Dialogue. He asked a few questions about the treatment of tides. Galileo told him he would clarify those points in final draft. What Galileo did was put the Pope's questions in the mouth of the doltish character of Simplicio, and has the all-wise interlocutor Salviati dismissively swat them away. Unfortunately, the Pope's questions were reasonable, and Galileo's response was sophistry. Galileo also had a rural prelate provide the Imprimatur for the final draft, to avoid any Vatican interference. Kinda guy who could piss off the Pope.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.