Well, it's not. The Urusula thing, for example, is taken out of context. She contradicted herself in the same speech, so it really depends on which part of the speech you want to believe. The writer wants you to believe it's some kind of Freudian slip and there's a massive conspiracy to hide Ukrainian war dead, even with a host of international observers, journalists and military experts watching the war closely and from within Ukraine itself.
Actually, it is. I saw the original and modified video where the EU removed the offending statement.
Here’s a clip of the original:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EB8GQnRJHWg
Can you honestly say she did not say “more than 100,000 Ukrainian military officers have been killed so far”?
Now, you can argue she was given false information but what you cannot do is claim she misspoke and was actually referring to casualties instead of deaths because the phrasing and its context cannot substitute “killed” with “casualties.” She said immediately prior that 20,000 Ukrainian civilians have been killed. So, the data set she used was “killed” not “casualties.”
I can’t a person with your chosen screen name seriously.