"Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference ???"
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument
Post-FDR era federal judges are evidently not bothering to review state constitutions when deciding such cases.
Excerpted from Connecticut Constitution:
"Article III, Connecticut ConstitutionSection 1
Text of Section 1:
The legislative power of the state shall be vested in two distinct houses or branches; the one to be styled the senate, the other the house of representatives, and both together the general assembly. The style of their laws shall be: Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Assembly convened."
I don't see mention of Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference in Connecticut Section 1 Legislative Power.
The judge's decision seems to be another example of federal government not doing its express constitutional duty to guarantee each state a republican form of government.
"Article IV, Section 4: The United States shallguarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government [emphasis added] , and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence."
The answer is simple, women athletes should boycott any sport tournament that allows men to compete... when the gun sounds just stand there and do nothing.