Is there not a large blank space in the middle? Do you ever see a story which fills in this area? Do you ever read a story that uses words like sun and ocean?
I will submit there is no evidence of man-made global warming because no adherent to the popular mythology will acknowledge the existence of the sun. All I have ever seen are comments on weather events or physical phenomenon involving temperature followed by an assertion global warming is the cause. Such reasoning requires a complete disconnect between events and conclusions, and is no more rigorous than Middle Age alchemy.
I have yet to find any article which attempts to measure the influence of the sun and then ascribe an increment to human activity. It was only since the late 70’s that it was possible to measure changes in the sun’s radiance independent of earth.
Even before that time any true scientist would have said data collected could not be analyzed, because people had known for centuries the sun was a variable star and it was not possible to separate influences for any mathematical computations. Now that it is possible to separate the influence of the sun the analysis of such a complicated interaction is still highly problematic. Therefore, political rhetoric must be substituted for application of the scientific method.
Intelligent posts like yours are why I FReep. Research-wise we are likely to continue to get the same junk conclusions because the funding sources perpetuate the ‘alchemy’. Those who do not tow the party line get economically canceled in the next budget. If the scientific method were strictly adhered to the GW/CC proponents would necessarily be their own harshest critics. They would recognize that correlation is not causation!
Here’s one of the best video to rebut the Global Warming hysteria - by a Nobel Winning Physicist.
Enjoy...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a15EqcRl8W4