Global Poll Finds Nearly 4 In 10 People Believe Climate Change Is Natural

Summit News ^ | 12/13/2022 | Paul Joseph Watson

[HamiltonJay]

that should be 10 out of 10..

Climate has always changed, and will always change, long before man and long after we have gone.

[ken in texas]

Well, of course not. They can’t get a word in edgewise. ;-)

[1Old Pro]

37 per cent of respondents said they believed it was “mainly due to the kinds of natural phenomena that the Earth has experienced throughout its history.”

Makes sense given that about 37 percent of people are actual thinkers and intelligent.

[1Old Pro]

37 per cent of respondents said they believed it was “mainly due to the kinds of natural phenomena that the Earth has experienced throughout its history.”

Makes sense given that about 37 percent of people are actual thinkers and intelligent.

[Retain Mike]

Turn a blank sheet of paper sideways. On the left write “weather event” in small letters, draw a circle around the words, and then draw a small arrow pointing to the right side. On the far right, write the words "manmade climate change” in small letters, draw a circle around the words, and then draw a small arrow pointing to the circle.

Is there not a large blank space in the middle? Do you ever see a story which fills in this area? Do you ever read a story that uses words like sun and ocean?

I will submit there is no evidence of man-made global warming because no adherent to the popular mythology will acknowledge the existence of the sun. All I have ever seen are comments on weather events or physical phenomenon involving temperature followed by an assertion global warming is the cause. Such reasoning requires a complete disconnect between events and conclusions, and is no more rigorous than Middle Age alchemy.

I have yet to find any article which attempts to measure the influence of the sun and then ascribe an increment to human activity. It was only since the late 70’s that it was possible to measure changes in the sun’s radiance independent of earth.

Even before that time any true scientist would have said data collected could not be analyzed, because people had known for centuries the sun was a variable star and it was not possible to separate influences for any mathematical computations. Now that it is possible to separate the influence of the sun the analysis of such a complicated interaction is still highly problematic. Therefore, political rhetoric must be substituted for application of the scientific method.

[Steve_Seattle]

It is not even debatable that climate change is natural. The climate was changing for millions of years before the invention of human technology.

[Coffee... Black... No Sugar]

Intelligent posts like yours are why I FReep. Research-wise we are likely to continue to get the same junk conclusions because the funding sources perpetuate the ‘alchemy’. Those who do not tow the party line get economically canceled in the next budget. If the scientific method were strictly adhered to the GW/CC proponents would necessarily be their own harshest critics. They would recognize that correlation is not causation!

[Retain Mike]

Thank you.

[Pajamajan]

Your post 10-Excellent Meme.

[aquila48]

Here’s one of the best video to rebut the Global Warming hysteria - by a Nobel Winning Physicist.

Enjoy...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a15EqcRl8W4

[GingisK]

That is very close to the ratio between scientifically aware people and those who aren’t.

[Retain Mike]

Thank you.

[linMcHlp]

In my house there’s this light switch that doesn’t do anything. Every so often I would flick it on and off just to check. Yesterday, I got a call from a woman in Madagascar. She said, ‘Cut it out.’

- Steven Wright