Magazine capacity restrictions and permitting requirements have a proven track record: they save lives!
1. Has the AG been challenged to present the research behind that statement?
2. If I’m not mistaken, this law had very little to do with magazines. But was more about the ridiculous requirements about getting training from state government approved instructors, instructors had to be a graduate of a law enforcement academy, all while none of those things were available to the citizens. De Facto banning of guns since the government didn’t put into place a mechanism for the people of Oregon to abide by the law.
While not knowing everything about the law, it would have been awesome if the Conservative Sheriff’s on the eastern side of the state started giving classes. Make the people shoot to the same standard as the cops. Be real hard to go after someone for not knowing what they’re doing if they met the same standards that all the cops have to.
“While not knowing everything about the law, it would have been awesome if the Conservative Sheriff’s on the eastern side of the state started giving classes. Make the people shoot to the same standard as the cops. Be real hard to go after someone for not knowing what they’re doing if they met the same standards that all the cops have to.”
The Musashi project!
Correct! It is definitely a de facto ban on new gun purchases, because there is no way to give people instruction from certified law enforcement. The police here don’t have the resources to do their job as it already is. Guaranteed this will be on the very bottom of their list of priorities, except in the rural counties that have decent sheriffs.