Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: semimojo
Definitely hyperventilating GP here but it looks like the guy named the parent of Politifact and disclaims specific knowledge about who, what, where they operated. It’s an interesting data point but too soon to light hair on fire to be sure.

Stark contrast with the hard data from the Twitter files that they targeted specific conservative individuals and topics for shadow banning. They also lied about it. Executives of a publicly traded company. Would seem to me that would open them to legal or civil repercussions. We’ll see how far that goes. Haven’t seen anything shocking or unexpected yet.

10 posted on 12/09/2022 8:25:09 AM PST by newzjunkey (How does GA end up with 2 Dem senators & 100% GOP statewide officials??? UGH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: newzjunkey
Stark contrast with the hard data from the Twitter files that they targeted specific conservative individuals and topics for shadow banning. They also lied about it...Would seem to me that would open them to legal or civil repercussions.

They'll say what they were doing wasn't shadow banning.

Musk said Twitter will continue to limit "the reach" of certain types of speech but he probably wouldn't call it shadow banning either.

14 posted on 12/09/2022 9:08:59 AM PST by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson