Look at the graph again and you will see that Covid 'vaccines' are unprecedented in their level of harm when compared to all other vaccines combined, including smallpox.
Now the rest of your excuse making pretends the graph does not exist, and ignores the fact that it's CDC data, and therefore just the tip of the iceberg.
When smallpox vaccines become worst than Covid vaccines, we'll know they have reconfigured the smallpox vaccine on the mRNA platform already, because Fauci said the Covid mRNA platform was so successful that all vaccines going forward would use the technology.
If/when the smallpox vaccine becomes mRNA based, then Covid vaccine deaths and harm will have a competitor for death/vaccine harm, along with any other mRNA vaccine.
This sentence is false "According to the JAMA article, 1626 out of 192,405,448 developed myocarditis after the Covid vaccine. "
And this one is false to a bizarre degree "According to these studies, one is far more likely to develop myocarditis after a smallpox vaccine than a Covid vaccine. Still, there is an elevated risk with the Covid "
I see nothing in your response but smarmy whitewashing apologetics from a pharma-phile defending the CDC 'narrative'.
You keep posting a graph purportedly based on VAERS data from an unknown site you have never provided a link for. How about a link? Who can gauge its credibility with no link, no explanation of how the VAERS data was gathered and interpreted? Are you ashamed of your source?
Furthermore, see my #71 for how VAERS actually works:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4114885/posts?page=71#71
>>>Ransomnote wrote “This sentence is false “According to the JAMA article, 1626 out of 192,405,448 developed myocarditis after the Covid vaccine.””<<<<<
Did you not check the JAMA article? Or can you not read? It clearly states:
“Among 192 405 448 persons receiving a total of 354 100 845 mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines during the study period, there were 1991 reports of myocarditis to VAERS and 1626 of these reports met the case definition of myocarditis.”
Here’s the link again. Please check it this time:
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2788346
How can you possibly claim that was a false statement?
>>>>Random note wrote: “And this one is false to a bizarre degree “According to these studies, one is far more likely to develop myocarditis after a smallpox vaccine than a Covid vaccine. Still, there is an elevated risk with the Covid.””<<<<<<
Really, dear? How so? I proved its truth it my post #63.
Here is the proof again, quoted from my #63:
******
“The incidence of confirmed myocarditis secondary to smallpox vaccination is estimated to be 16.1 per 100 000 service members, with a recent Department of Defense study estimating 12 per 100 000 in a review of 730 000 service members.” (See pages 6-7)
[Link (again) to BMJ article referenced in quote above:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5878341/ ]
According to the JAMA article, 1626 out of 192,405,448 developed myocarditis after the Covid vaccine. That’s less than 0.08/100,000, right? (yes, please check my math — doing this in my head.). Compared to 12/100,000 to 16/100,000 for the smallpox vaccine.
******
So, are you claiming that a 0.8 per 100,000 incidence after Covid vaccine is not lower than the 12 per 100,000 or 16 per 100,000 incidence after the smallpox vaccine? Really? If you are having trouble doing math or understanding these numbers, perhaps you could ask someone to help you.
>>>>>Ransomnote wrote: “I see nothing in your response but smarmy whitewashing apologetics from a pharma-phile defending the CDC ‘narrative’.”<<<<<<
I see nothing but someone plugging her ears and shouting “no no no no” in yours. See above. You just say “false” with zero proof to back it up. I provided proof. As for the last bit, insults and name calling do not help your case, but rather are the mark of desperation from one who has no facts or reputable references to back up her case. And especially rich coming from someone who has repeatedly shilled for donations for The Expose here, a site run by some machine shop guy in England.
I also note you did not address the high likelihood the little girl in question never received any Covid vaccine. Hmm. Yet you insist it was the vaccine that killed her, not the severe case of influenza she had. Interesting.