That one line could be interpreted two ways. One interpretation was sinister ("I'd dismiss the Constitution and just become president, if I could") and the other interpretation was benign and correct ("Fraus Omnia Vitiat... Fraud vitiates everything. The actions of Democrats are such that all rules, even the Constitution, has been destroyed by them.")
Now look at my second interpretation. I stated it in such a way that it CANNOT be misinterpreted. Why can't Trump?
I know you, and many others, immediately saw that Trump was trying to express the second of my two interpretations. My only point was this: His quote was vague enough to have two interpretations. Why be vague at all? I was able to state his point in a way that was not vague. That is my point.
"Fraus Omnia Vitiat... Fraud vitiates everything. The actions of Democrats are such that all rules, even the Constitution, has been destroyed by them." Bang. Zoom. Game over.
However, Jim Robinson states, accurately, that one of the things we loved about Trump in 2016 was that he was bold and combative in his statements. It's a good point.
Laz……as naive and uncomprehending as I am……and I am!…..even I have realized Trump’s nature in ginning up conversation about what he wants discussed.
I’m even considering he and Musk might be ‘tag teaming’ each other lately.
They are two brilliant, wealthy Patriotic men……who want their ‘outcomes’ and will fight for it.