You are entitled to ascribe any reason you choose to Trump’s actions. In this particular instance, I’m not sure where he’s headed with his “unprecedented cure” phrase. And that phrase was not part of a question.
In this particular instance, I’m not sure where he’s headed with his “unprecedented cure” phrase.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You are absolutely correct... he didn’t spell that out and for good reason. However, it seems that this might exactly be the point... I’m sure he had numerous objectives when he wrote what he did and we can speculate about that until the cows come home. Regardless, one objective seems to be that he wants to make it resoundingly obvious to all (to the level of acknowledgement) that the DemRats, enemedia and the FIB have pushed the country into a position of uncharted and dangerous waters for where there is no ‘prescriptive cure’ (if I can use that term). He didn’t create this situation, but he has warned about it over and over as he has battled the DemRats, enemedia and FIB over what they did (speaking specifically but not exclusively about the 2020 election)...... Now that it’s patently obvious to all (except those with their fingers in their ears shouting “I can’t hear you!) PDJT is essentially asking the questions (and I would argue he is asking this in a rhetorical sense to the whole country to get them thinking hard about this matter), “What do you want to do about it, what remedy is acceptable?”
If there is no remedy to what they did, then life carries on with it now an ingrained part of our lives that what the DemRats, enemdia and FIB did is acceptable (by definition if nothing is done about it).... unless people have the hope that the DemRats, enemedia and FIB have a ‘come to Jesus moment’ and will make massive changes to their philosophy and MO on their own that will assume that in the future, they agree to conducting their affairs in an honest way and will do their part to ensure a level playing field. Are you counting on that? If not, this then brings back the question of “what is the remedy.... and that can be further segmented into what is the remedy to fraud that was done in the past as well as how are things going to be done in the future?”
This brings the thought process to another aspect of what has gone on in recent weeks and that is that PDJT has started to use the word ‘communist’ more and more as he describes the DemRats and their unholy alliance with the enemdia and the FIB. Is he wrong to do that? In what way is the current situation different than a communist country? He didn’t ask this question in his message, but he may as well have.... “If there is no remedy that is enacted, does that mean that you are happy about living under one party rule that was created through fraudulent means? Do you find it acceptable to live under a communist regime?”