“I want to do video depictions of ‘It’s a Wonderful Life,’ and knowing that movie very well, I want to be authentic, and so only white children and families can be customers for that particular product. Everybody else can, I’ll give to everybody else I’ll sell them anything they want, just not the ‘It’s a Wonderful Life’ depictions,” Ketanji Brown Jackson said. “I‘m expressing something, right? For the purposes of that speech. I can say anti-discrimination laws can’t make me sell ‘It’s a Wonderful Life’ packages to non-white individuals.”
—
WTF is she babbling about? For one thing, It’s a Wonderful Life had black people in the movie. For that matter, it had immigrants. Even the disabled if you count old man Potter. It was pretty woke for the 1940s.
I thought oral arguments are made by the ones bringing the case not a Supreme Court judge. She can ask questions but giving an opinion is saved until June next year, is it not?
You’re right - what she said makes absolutely no sense whatsoever but I guess allowances will be made since she’s so bright!