You are wrong.
The only thing the Constitution says about appointing Presidents is that the State Legislatures appoint Electors, who then vote in the only Presidential election that exists under the Constitution.
The appointed Electors did exactly that, on December 14, 2020. No state legislature, not Wisconsin, not Michigan, not Pennsylvania, Georgia, or Arizona disputed these appointments, which they had every right to do.
The election result was Biden 306, Trump 232, and Biden is the President while Trump is not.
The only thing the Constitution says about appointing Presidents is that the State Legislatures appoint Electors, who then vote in the only Presidential election that exists under the Constitution.
You keep saying this like it's some great revelation. You say it over and over in your posts and I've never once disagreed with it. My point goes beyond that.
The appointed Electors did exactly that, on December 14, 2020. No state legislature, not Wisconsin, not Michigan, not Pennsylvania, Georgia, or Arizona disputed these appointments, which they had every right to do.
The state legislatures could claim in court that it's within their constitutional power to pick new electors based on new non fraudulent information. Or they could do nothing.
And then there's the case where the state legislatures using statute left the process of picking the electors up to the people of their state. In that case it would be the voters who could make the claim in court that they have the legal right, under the Constitution AND statue to have a revote.