He could be. But, he'll need to do a better job of specifically proving how the "ELECTION IS IRREFUTABLY FRAUDULENT" to quote him, in my opinion. There may have been 2,000 mules in one state, etc, but none of that evidence from a nationwide perspective has ever been adequately gathered, sorted, validated, and presented coherently that I've seen.
There were a couple of projects that got started, on his behalf, back in early 2021, to gather and track that type of information. You can see in my posting history where I was trying to track them. I believe I even created at least one vanity post asking where that type of information was being gathered, which unfortunately resulted in not much being known.
Maybe those projects were hoping that Trump would fund them, but they withered away when he mostly disappeared from sight that year. Not much has changed since then, with regard to a database of what illegal activity supposedly happened, and where, and supposedly by whom.
Without that type of evidentiary information, accusations are cheap, some would say. Did he ever even pursue anything in court after he left office? Some said that would have been the right time. Seems like after Rudy struck out they called it a day legally on went on a PR campaign.
Evidence was gathered. The courts never allowed the evidence to be heard.
The subject of the involvement of the National government in the choice and quadrennial replacement of the President was discussed, extensively, at the Philadelphia Convention.
Congress was given the power to regulate elections of Senators and Representatives, but was not granted ANY authority over the power of the State Legislatures, which were tasked with choosing the President through the means of appointing Electors.
With the single exception of Amendment XXIII, when Congress awarded itself 3 electoral votes, this system has stood the test of time.
The Constitution makes no reference to “announcing”, primaries, conventions, nominees, “running”, or voting by individuals. The Constitution makes no reference to news agencies “calling” States. The only people the Constitution confers a “right to vote for President” on are the 535 Electors appointed by State Legislatures, or the 3 appointed by Congress since 1964.
No State Legislature objected to the appointment of Electors under its power. The Legislatures of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Georgia, and Arizona did not even CONVENE to discuss the question.
How those Legislatures planned to appoint their Electors is irrelevant. Who voted, who didn’t, how many people voted, how the votes were counted, when Arizona was “called”, who besides the appointed Electors claimed to be the rightful Electors HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE US CONSTITUTION.
There was only one election that mattered under the Constitution, it took place on December 14, 2000, and Joe Biden and Kamala Harris won it 306-232.