[SteelPSUGOP]

Musk is wrong on this. Twitter acting on its own to suppress speech is still a violation of free speech.

Free Speech is a fundamental right, an inalienable right, which cannot be taken away.

[AndyJackson]

Twitter acting on its own to suppress speech is still a violation of free speech.

While I agree that large social media platforms should be treated under the same laws as any other utility, the point is legally arguable which is why it is being argued. But the SOS of Arizona pressuring a private entity to suppress free speech to further her own campaign is an abuse of power in violation of the civil rights of the citizens of the US and she she be sued to hell and gone for it.

[MinorityRepublican]

Musk is wrong on this. Twitter acting on its own to suppress speech is still a violation of free speech. Free Speech is a fundamental right, an inalienable right, which cannot be taken away.

The Supreme Court needs to rule on this.

[PeterPrinciple]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech

you are right, even liberals have a historical position on it.........................

[nwrep]

True as an abstract value, but the legally enforceable part is only in cases of government interference. The corporate part is not yet fully defined in its scope by the courts. Legal cases still pending.

[JudgemAll]

Twitter violated its terms of use and passed for an open forum, which it was not not…. should have been called democrat Communist Underground

[wastedyears]

Sounds like conspiracy to me.