Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: semimojo

“the Court will not condone litigants … furthering false narratives that baselessly undermine public trust at a time of increasing disinformation about, and distrust in, the democratic process”

very interesting law analysis


2 posted on 12/01/2022 7:10:25 PM PST by TTFX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TTFX

We cannot hear your case because *** I *** think it is false, despite the fact that I have not reviewed evidence.

You know what actually undermines public trust in the process? Seeing fraud and being denied any opportunity to present your case. Being denied the right to a lawyer because they are sanctioned for representing you. Being silenced on most social media.


4 posted on 12/01/2022 7:15:12 PM PST by DesertRhino (Dogs are called man's best friend. Moslems hate dogs. Add it up..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: TTFX

Well, the judge is full of crap, and the WaPo is full of crap, but certification does mean (1) post-election lawsuits can go forward, and (2) the newly-won Congressional seat is now safely Republican.


9 posted on 12/01/2022 7:18:08 PM PST by MrChips ("To wisdom belongs the apprehension of eternal things." - St. Augustine )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: TTFX

Scripted.


13 posted on 12/01/2022 7:24:54 PM PST by lastchance (Credo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: TTFX

Yeah, if you think legal analysis is repeating talking points from Democrat party emails


22 posted on 12/01/2022 7:35:30 PM PST by Regulator (It's fraud, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: TTFX

Once again a political ruling, only loosely based on law.


36 posted on 12/01/2022 8:22:56 PM PST by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: TTFX
“the Court will not condone litigants … furthering false narratives that baselessly undermine public trust..."

Was this litigated before this judge with evidence presented both pro and con, or is this judge inserting his own opinion as fact and then ruling on that?

-PJ

38 posted on 12/01/2022 8:28:50 PM PST by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: TTFX

And they are certain it’s a “false narrative” without any examination of the facts.


46 posted on 12/02/2022 3:44:59 AM PST by Eleutheria5 (Free country? Good morning, Rip. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: TTFX

Cochise County has legitimate concerns. Since Maricopa County conducted a pristine election and 40% of the voting machines malfunctioned, then Cochise has to suspect their own results since ZERO machines malfunctioned.

Lob logic turned on its ear.

EC


47 posted on 12/02/2022 4:58:21 AM PST by Ex-Con777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: TTFX

Obama Judge. Funny, the rats always have the person they need in the position they need at the time they are needed.


49 posted on 12/02/2022 7:54:17 AM PST by gibsonguy ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: TTFX

It no longer IS a Democratic Process.

Garth Brooks is planning a ‘Las Vegas Residency’ in 2023-—May thru Dec.

ALL THE TICKETS-—TO ALL THE SEATS-—TO ALL THE SHOWS over 8 months were sold out in ONE DAY.

We can process those transactions-—but we cannot run a clean election.

TIME FOR PAYBACK


51 posted on 12/02/2022 8:34:50 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson