[Gay State Conservative]

At least 99% of retraining order requests (AKA: "protection orders") filed by women against men are granted...and it's not difficult to see why. There's no downside for a judge who grants such a request.It's not as if he/she is gonna be removed from the bench for granting a frivolous,unfounded request.OTOH there's a *huge* downside for a judge who refuses to grant a request and then,days later,the woman winds up being murdered by that husband/boyfriend.

The big problem with them is that the husband/boyfriend isn't allowed to present his side to the judge.

As for this case the Rats are employing their typical lawfare strategy when it comes to the 2nd Amendment...delay,delay,delay.

[JewishRighter]

You make excellent points, but there’s more: the defendant has very little chance of avoiding the restraining order becoming permanent because the only thing the complainant has to testify to is that he/she (usually she) was put in fear of bodily harm. This is obviously so subjective that it is virtually impossible to refute. The exception would be the husband is a quadriplegic or similarly incapable of harming anyone at all.

[Az Joe]

There is always the right for the defendant to request a hearing on quashing the restraining order, usually held within 10 days.

That said, most of the time a RO is used a tool to screw the male.