Well here’s what she needs to fight for: Election laws that set standards for misconduct, fraud, vote count irregularities, machine breakdowns, gaps in counting, ballot mishandling, etc - whatever you can think of that they’ve done, put it on the list and set thresholds that constitute election failure. The threshold has to allow for normal variations and human error but low enough that actual fraud cannot be done. I would not be hard to create this set of standards.
Then the kicker: once the threshold is exceeded, all election results are void and a new election must be scheduled within X days. Under added scrutiny and oversight, by for example, the state police.
This is the ONLY solution that will work. The cheating will continue as long as the laws only provide for punishing those who get caught. That’s nothing. What we must have are standards under which elections can be declared to be failed and nullified. Only then will they be forced to play fair.
“once the threshold is exceeded, all election results are void and a new election must be scheduled within X days.”
That’s how it was when I ran elections in the ‘80s. If even ONE person was disenfranchised, that triggered a re-election within 30 days. It was so tight that anyone who wanted to vote had to be given a ballot, even if he wasn’t registered, went to the wrong polling place, etc.. (They were given Challenged Ballots, and were weeded out during canvass — not counted — eventually.) Under no circumstances could someone be denied the opportunity to vote.
In Maricopa, THOUSANDS were disenfranchised. Thousands.
I had nightmares about a precinct worker perhaps saying “no” to a voter, or having a person not be able to vote.