[for-q-clinton]

How is it they can be forced/sued to certify an illegitimate election? But not forced/sued to not certify that election?

It appears the law is 100% on the fraud side.

[for-q-clinton]

If one must certify no matter what...why even certify? Other than smoke and mirrors it doesn’t provide any value.

[Revel]

“How is it they can be forced/sued to certify an illegitimate election? But not forced/sued to not certify that election?”

Crazy that someone can be sued for not certifying vote fraud. But that is what we are now. Corrupt to the core. Certification means absolutely nothing except that the fraudulent votes can be counted. The entire system in America has been corrupted like this now. A few powerful people can override the entire system. Not just voting systems.

[Pajamajan]

"How is it they can be forced/sued to certify an illegitimate election? But not forced/sued to not certify that election?"

Those are good questions.

[Mr Rogers]

Maybe proof of fraud would help? NOT proof of INCOMPETENCE, but fraud? Also, once certified, the results CAN be challenged in court. Until then, there is nothing to challenge.

[Sgt_Schultze]

The board is the same group that tried to order a full hand count of the ballots, but their efforts were blocked by courts several times.

There is only a SINGLE reason there would be an objection to a hand count to confirm the totals.

[Sarcazmo]

I came here to say just that.

At this point, what does certification even mean?

I thought certification means everything is good to go. Can you imagine if this was how airplane engines got certified to fly?