Why would the USA taking out an active, loose enemy like Soleimani be the equivalent of torturing and killing captive prisoners who (1) weren't generals, (2) weren't criminals, (3) hadn't committed any actual crimes, (4) were not planning to commit an actual crime? And does this mean you are in favor of Wagner's slow torture and murder of the Syrian who allegedy deserted Assad's army (there was never any proof that he was even a deserter) on the grounds that "every country does it"? You say I'm blind, so maybe you can walk me through the equivalence you are attempting to make in a clear, logical way.
Obama admitted he droned over 3000 people.
No doubt they were all convicted murderers