Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump-Backed Candidate In California Wins, Increasing Republican House Majority
American Lookout ^ | November 23, 2022 | Mike LaChance

Posted on 11/24/2022 11:35:11 AM PST by SoConPubbie

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: lasereye

Your analysis ONLY has value if there is no Voting Fraud.

Is that what you are pushing?

You do know that most of the Voting Fraud evidence is found in those “purplish” districts, right?


41 posted on 11/24/2022 6:10:41 PM PST by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Still not enough to overcome the RAT-RINO alliance.


42 posted on 11/24/2022 8:04:09 PM PST by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

I don’t know that all the districts where Trump’s candidates lost were due to voting fraud, if that’s what you’re saying. Where are you getting that from? Tell me what districts the voting fraud evidence was found and give me the links.

Further, if we just assume that voting fraud accounted for Trump’s candidates losing all those districts, which is stupid, we would still be left with the Trump backed candidates only doing well in deep red districts, where any Republican would win. As I said, you have to be stupid to think that proves something. But people keep citing that number.

If you really are claiming that everything is rigged everywhere but the deep red places, then Trump can’t win anyway. So why are you backing him? Just to see him run again?


43 posted on 11/24/2022 8:27:15 PM PST by lasereye ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: lasereye; Hostage; SoConPubbie
I'm guessing that the 15 or so losses were in purplish districts. Therefore, the losses logically are valid indicators of Trump's effect on the election. Those 15 losses may explain the Republican underperformance all by itself. In a "wave" election the winning party sweeps the purple Congressional districts, which didn't happen.

The 2020 "election" was proof-of-concept.

The 2022 "election" was an engineered "election".

Many outcomes were desirable to the Uniparty, whose main goals appear to have been hang Trump with a "loser" tag, rough up MAGA, retain certain governorships and other state offices, keep control of the US Senate and minimize the red wave in the US House.

Complete success.

They even have people on our side believing that the policies of Ron DeSantis led to his crushing victory in Florida.

44 posted on 11/24/2022 8:53:39 PM PST by kiryandil (put yer vote in the box, chump. HARHARHARHAR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

I’m seeing a psychotic theme that the Uniparty has everything rigged and simultaneously that anyone who says Trump won’t win if he’s the 2024 nominee is a Uniparty liar or dupe.

If everything’s rigged then he won’t win, period. But we have to nominate him according to your type. It’s bizarre.


45 posted on 11/24/2022 9:42:15 PM PST by lasereye ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: lasereye
I’m seeing a psychotic theme that the Uniparty has everything rigged and simultaneously that anyone who says Trump won’t win if he’s the 2024 nominee is a Uniparty liar or dupe.

I'm not sure what you're talking about.

I myself don't believe that Trump will win in 2024. They already rigged an "election" in front of God and everybody, and not much has changed. Why on earth would anyone think that they're not going to do the same thing?

On the other hand, I created a tool that shows me where to look for the vote fraud.

It's pretty accurate.

For example, in Colorado CD-3 [Boebert's district], they rigged Mesa County hard trying to get rid of her.

They are getting a recount, but I hope there's no shenanigans.

46 posted on 11/24/2022 9:50:32 PM PST by kiryandil (put yer vote in the box, chump. HARHARHARHAR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: lasereye
I’m seeing a psychotic theme that the Uniparty has everything rigged

They can't rig EVERYTHING.

They only have so much money [FTX and the like] to manufacture "votes".

That's why you saw the sausage casings split in New York state - they trusted their ordinary political machine to carry the day, while the money was spent elsewhere, in more important [for The Narrative] races.

Didn't work out for them, there.

47 posted on 11/24/2022 9:54:05 PM PST by kiryandil (put yer vote in the box, chump. HARHARHARHAR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

Maybe you’re not saying that but others are.


48 posted on 11/24/2022 10:02:42 PM PST by lasereye ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: lasereye
I disagree with them in both instances.

The Uniparty would LIKE to "rig everything" - but they can't.

I don't think Trump will win if he's the 2024 nominee - but I don't think DeSantis will win if he's the 2024 nominee, either.

I was reading that the vote fraud math has nearly 270 electoral votes already locked up for the Demoscats in 2024.

I think that Trump should run - but the fraudsters will have to be dragged out into the public square and be dealt with.

I'm not confident that will happen.

49 posted on 11/24/2022 10:15:54 PM PST by kiryandil (put yer vote in the box, chump. HARHARHARHAR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson