Posted on 11/20/2022 9:51:46 PM PST by SeekAndFind
When the 2020 presidential election produced surprising results leaning toward Democrat candidates, eyebrows were raised. But in the recent midterm election in Arizona, given the previous election snafus, situations arose that even go against the state laws regarding elections.
Arizona GOP gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake’s campaign was confident that she had the votes to win, but at the last minute, her competitor pulled ahead amid questionable circumstances. Lake and her campaign have now called for a redo of the election in Maricopa County in light of all the problems that occurred on Election Day, and her call has been answered by the state assistant AG.
Arizona Assistant Attorney General Jennifer Wright — with the Elections Integrity Unit — wrote a letter to the Maricopa County officials Saturday demanding an accounting for the widespread ballot tabulation and ballot printer problems seen during the general election on Nov. 8.
Among the most troubling issues raised in the letter directed to Thomas Liddy with the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office was the apparent co-mingling of ballots in black duffle bags in at least one polling location, which was successfully run through the on-site tabulators with those put in “Door 3” to be sent to the Election Department’s downtown Phoenix tabulation center because they could not be read.
“The Elections Integrity Unit (“Unit”) of the Arizona Attorney General’s Office (“AGO”) has received hundreds of complaints since Election Day pertaining to issues related to the administration of the 2022 General Election in Maricopa County,” Wright opened her letter.
“These complaints go beyond pure speculation, but include first-hand witness accounts that raise concerns regarding Maricopa’s lawful compliance with Arizona election law,” she continued.
Wright wrote that statements made by Maricopa Board of Supervisors Chairman Bill Gates and County Recorder Stephen Richer, along with other official communications from the county appear to confirm potential election law violations. She recounted that based on information provided by the county at least 60 polling locations’ ballot on-demand printers were configured improperly, leading to the inability of the tabulators to read the ballots.
Ballots are printed on demand because voters are able to check in at any location in Maricopa County, which includes multiple congressional, state and local districts.
“Based on sworn complaints submitted by election workers employed by Maricopa County, the BOD printers were tested on Monday, November 7 without any apparent problems,” Wright wrote. Despite these tests, the printers began malfunctioning within the first half-an-hour on Election Day.
In light of this, the AG’s office wants logs related to when printer configuration changes were made, along with other related information.
Wright also wanted to know the instructions poll workers gave to voters who experienced problems with their ballots being accepted by tabulation machines.
“Following widespread reports of problems at voting locations on Election Day, Chairman Gates publicly stated that voters who had already checked in to e-Pollbook, but were having difficulties voting could ‘check out’ of that voting location, and would be able to nonetheless vote in another voting location,” she wrote.
“Based on sworn complaints received by the Unit, not only have poll workers reported that they were not trained and/or not provided with information on how to execute ‘check out’ procedures, but many voters have reported the second voting location required the voter to cast a provisional ballot as the e-Pollbooks maintained the voter had cast a ballot in the original voting location.” she added.
Wright pointed out that Arizona state law prohibits a voter to cast a provisional ballot who has already been signed in electronically. Additionally, the attorney noted that state law was also apparently violated when poll workers failed to keep ballots that were successfully tabulated on site segregated from those that were not.
“Maricopa County has admitted that[,] in some voting locations, ‘Door 3’ non-tabulated ballots were commingled with tabulated ballots at the voting location,” Wright wrote.
“Further, we have received a sworn complaint from an election observer indicating that more than 1700 ‘Door 3’ non-tabulated ballots from one voting location were placed in black duffle bags that were intended to be used for tabulated ballots,” she added. “Pursuant to Arizona law, Maricopa County was required to complete ‘reconciliation of ballots cast against check ins’ at the voting locations before leaving the voting location, not at central count.
The AG’s office requested a copy of each voting location’s Official Ballot Report, along with the total number of ballots that were co-mingled, and Wright has further demanded a response to all the issues raised in her letter on or before Nov. 28 when a official canvas is of due to Arizona’s Secretary of State office, Western Journal reports.
Problems with one election could be an accident, but problems with the next election as well need full accountability.
“Arizonans deserve a full report and accounting of the myriad problems that occurred in relation to Maricopa County’s administration of the 2022 General Election. As the canvass is looming, and these issues relate to Maricopa County’s ability to lawfully certify election results,” she concluded.
BREAKING: Arizona AG @brnoforaz sends a letter to Maricopa County.
“Arizonans deserve a full report and accounting of the myriad problems that occurred in relation to Maricopa County's administration of the 2022 General Election.”#AZVoterSuppression pic.twitter.com/o2YfdNG1wN
— Olivia Brown🇺🇸 (@oliviaintheusa) November 20, 2022
Are they addressing the issue, or are they getting to it first so they can cover up the investigation and ensure nothing embarrassing is revealed?
IDGAF anymore. I hope I die before I see much more. Oh...before I go I gotta say two things...One: I feel sorry for the kids that will be adults in a decade. Two: I’m really glad that I never had kids.
If they would just start pulling some of these crooked election orchestrators out and hang them, it would stop . Real quick.
There’s never any downside
a little late for the reply nov 28.
Yes
Well that’s the right way to make sure they erase all evidence and just reset the machines. He should have ordered law enforcement to go seize the machines and place them under 24 hour guard until certified technicians could retrieve the data. Or better yet, seize the machines and have technicians accompanying the LEOs and immediately download the printer logs.
Well, refuse to certify it. Then open the can of worms and do a thorough evaluation and send the criminals to jail.
The Tom Liddy this letter is directed to is the son of G. Gordon Liddy of Watergate fame also media personality in his later years.
Mr. Liddy is supposed to reply within one week. We shall see.
I think the first week of December....the refusal to certify the election will occur, and all heck will break loose. In the end, probably toward mid-January, the Supreme Court will get this and just say a 2nd election is the only option...but they won’t be able to cite any federal/state law that fits.
But I would ask the question...can this one county run a legit election?
“Oh noes” the evil people cried out. An angry letter has stopped us from committing any more crimes!! 😐
Who decides to certify or not? Current SOS Hobbs I’d guess.
Agree. But the sparks might fly earlier on this one than you think.
exactly, the fbi would have///s
SOS delivers the election and I think the Senate approves the certification. If the Senate does not approve it, then it gets examined carefully.
In a perfect world, the SOS goes to jail.
As I understand it, there are 2 counties with such discrepancies. Maricopa County is the worst.
some background
https://time.com/6235360/arizona-delays-certifying-election-result/
https://www.azcleanelections.gov/election-security/how-elections-work
The County Board of Supervisors:
The Board of Supervisors (BOS) has specific election related responsibilities, including determining the polling places for Election Day, emergency early voting locations and certifying the official election results for the county. Importantly, the BOS also sets the budget for the County Recorder and County Elections Departments.
Brnovich and his entire staff is worthless.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.