Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Degaston

You meant 218, right?


8 posted on 11/14/2022 12:32:46 PM PST by Night Hides Not (Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad! Remember Gonzales! Come and Take It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Night Hides Not

No, I mean 228 - two hundred twenty-eight, not two hundred eighteen.

228 seats held by a Party - 10 margin of safety = 218 majority

Just because some Party has a slim majority of seats does not mean that they will be able to retain the Majority positions in the legislative house. History has shown that dirty tricks get played.

For example, don’t forget how the GOP “won” the California Assembly in the 1994 Election and “won” in the 2000 Election to retain control of the US Senate.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1995/01/25/california-speaker-brown-reelected/996a87c7-d51b-4eb1-9bc9-45db05873f8c/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2001/05/27/daschle-on-jeffordss-switch-its-the-demographics/1fb5bfe1-7435-42b9-a9e6-b8ac119ef84c/


32 posted on 11/14/2022 1:30:14 PM PST by Degaston (no autocrats please)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson