Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

It’s incredibly suspicious. One should statistically expect that all future batches of ballots would come within the standard deviation of previous batches. If the first 2 million ballots came in roughly 50:50, to expect that the last 400,000 would come in 2:1 in favor of one candidate at is just not a reasonable assumption.


8 posted on 11/13/2022 7:09:56 PM PST by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: monkeyshine
Even if Hobbs managed to STEAL THE GOVERNORSHIP for herself, THIS AIN'T OVER YET.

Time to get Independent voters to submit affidavits testifying to the fact THEY REALLY VOTED FOR KARI LAKE.

16 posted on 11/13/2022 7:24:04 PM PST by CivilWarBrewing (Get off my back for my usage of CAPS, especially you snowflake males! MAN UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: monkeyshine
One should statistically expect that all future batches of ballots would come within the standard deviation of previous batches.

That would be true if the batches represented random samples of ballots from the total set but they do not. As far as I can tell the batches of ballots are associated with particular vote centers or ballot collection points. As a result they represent the votes of a particular area or set of voters and therefore will not have the same distribution of votes as batches of ballots from other areas.

29 posted on 11/13/2022 8:17:50 PM PST by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson