Pro-Life Leader Says Oz Lost Because He Wasn’t Consistently Pro-Life

Life News ^ | November 9, 2022 | Mary Margaret Olohan

[No name given]

I agree with Marjorie on this one.

[Tijeras_Slim]

I think it’s more likely the huge number of mail in votes for Lurch before the debate was the factor.

[Jonty30]

I’m sure some people reacted to Oz’s imperfections and the media slander of him.

However, there is no way that Doughhead Fetterman won on his merits.

[Brian Griffin]

I’m not in favor of baby murder.

Be blunt!

[FLNittany]

Yeah...either that or massive voter fraud. One of the two. I’ll go with massive voter fraud.

[plain talk]

Oz wasn’t from PA ... and he didn’t have a D by his name.

[Halls]

I agree with you, but I also believe Oz was not pro life. If the would have had the debate earlier and Oz would have been more solid pro life this outcome might have been different.

[semimojo]

Anyone who doubts the abortion debate today is largely about political power, on both sides, should read this article.

[Travis McGee]

Nope. Not even close.

It's because "The Stupid Party" could not figure out that the Rats would take the wide-open no-controls no-checks mass-mail-in ballot policy left over (on purpose) from the Covid pandemic and drive 18 wheelers full of fake ballots through it.

How stupid does a party have to be not to see that 50% mail-in ballots for the Rats, vs. 10% for the GOP, did not "just happen" naturally and organically?

The Rats had the PA election won before election day. And other states as well.

It will take "The Stupid Part" weeks to figure it out. And they will be so afraid of being called "insurrectionist election deniers" that they won't even bring it up.

Why did Florida go 20 points for DeSantis? His handsome face? NO. Because FL outlawed mass-mail-in balloting, ballot harvesting, etc. To get a mail-in ballot in FL, you have to specifically request it, in writing, with ID proof. No mass-mail-in balloting, no Rat mass cheating.

[Travis McGee]

Please see #10 above.

[Morgana]

I very much agree and Oz was not as prolife as people want.

[Freee-dame]

If the establishment Republicans in DC were only the stupid party, we would have a chance for them to become educated. But since they are also the complicit party, there is no chance.

[dforest]

I agree. Fetterman didn’t win because he was pro life.

[Tijeras_Slim]

I agree Oz wasn’t as pro-life as conservatives wanted.

[BlackAdderess]

No. He lost because he ran a bad campaign and treated his supporters like sad b******* by trying to manipulate them with endless appeals to sympathy.

Doug Mastriano was suitably unambiguous on his pro-life stance, yet he lost by a far larger margin

[Chgogal]

So Pro Lifers in Pa. didn't vote Oz because his pro life language wasn't strident enough. Instead they allowed pro death Fetterman win the office. Brilliant strategy Pro Lifers.

[Boogieman]

Oz lost because he chose to run as a Republican in a statewide race in Pennsylvania.

[Aut Pax Aut Bellum]

Or the Left just cheated, again.

[Southside_Chicago_Republican]

She may be right, but for pro-life voters to withhold their votes from Oz for that reason is pretty shortsighted. No matter how mushy Oz was on this issue, there is no way he would ever be worse than Fetterman. Oz might come around on this issue. The are no pro-life Democrats that I know of. There was one in Illinois, Rep. Dan Lipinski, but he was booted out by the “progessives” in the 2020 primary. His pro-life stance was one of the major reasons why his own party wanted him out.