“””These people were struggling in the entryway but the door was opened by another person”””
The police chief did not say it was opened by ‘another person’.
He said: “door was opened by someone inside”.
At this point the ‘someone’ is Pelosi, Depape, or an unidentified another person.
Let me add that it would not be beyond belief for the SF Police and the media to intentionally mis-represent the facts so as to confuse the public.
If police found Pelosi and Depape fighting over the hammer, wouldn't that have made it impossible that either of them opened the door for the police before the police found them fighting over the hammer?
The police chief did not say it was opened by ‘another person’.
He said: “door was opened by someone inside”.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Bingo.... the police chief would appear to have left it ambiguous, likely deliberately. That way, if more information comes out that overwhelmingly indicates that there was a third person (or even more), they can point back to the statement and say it was correct. If on the other hand no such information comes out like that, they can always go back to the statement and say it meant that there were just two people... since one could potentially read that into the statement too. Technically, Pelosi and Dave could have been in the entranceway but if Pelosi at least had a hand free, he could have opened the door. That might make sense on one level...if it is true that he called the police and was trying to tip them off that he was in some form of danger using the ‘code language’ that the police chief suggested, then chances are that he would want to have been down at the entranceway to let the police in when they showed up.
From what I’ve seen, the police have only made two formal statements about this event (in front of reporters etc.) Is that all the formal statements that the police have made? Is there a Freeper that can confirm?