[God luvs America]

Does anyone think the people who voted for fetterman via mail before the debate would’ve changed their vote after the debate?

[TexasGunLover]

Does anyone think the people who voted for fetterman via mail before the debate would’ve changed their vote after the debate?

Of course not. Last night's performance isn't going to change the average left voter. It could have a mild effect on the middle, but certainly not on passionate lib voters.

[EEGator]

Apparently some here do.

They can’t seem to comprehend most Democrats.

[C210N]

The debate was scheduled for some time before it happened last evening. Those that already did mail-ins fall into two categories:

1. Were not aware that a debate was even a possibility, and would have not watched it any case.

2. Were aware that a debate was coming up, and not planning to watch and absorb it, voted mail-in anyway.

In short, the debate made little to no-difference to the mail-ins.

[Republican Wildcat]

Most of them? No.

The race may not end up being this close, but in a race that is close, even if only 1% would have changed their minds, that is all that could have made a difference.

[Drew68]

Does anyone think the people who voted for fetterman via mail before the debate would’ve changed their vote after the debate?

Exactly. I really don’t think debates these days do much if anything to move the needle.

I also don’t believe there are any “undecided” voters at this point in the campaign, —only voters who would rather not tell a pollster who they plan on voting for.

[gloryblaze]

Does anyone think the people who voted for fetterman via mail before the debate would’ve changed their vote after the debate?

A few may well decide differently, and, in a razor-thin margin, that is important. There were early rallies, with step-by-step instructions and promises, and crowd mentality and auction fever, etc.

Those who are easily manipulated are easily manipulated.