It is a State issue, as ruled by the Supreme Court. Roe v. Wade was overturned on that basis. Oz stated, (over and over), that it was a decision arrived at between the Doctor and his patient, and that the Federal Government should not be involved. To me, that is a perfect answer. Roe was always un-constitutional. Democrats have made it a “moral” issue and have bequeathed the Federal Government the right of intrusion on every aspect of our lives. The argument against Roe v. Wade should always be a State vs. Federal basis, not a woman’s “right to choose” (based on what?)
No, he stated it was between the doctor, the patient, and local government. Fetterman wants it between doctor and patient. That's the difference the two are trying to make.