I love the “Trump judges” and “Trumpiest” court angle. Trump appointed Federalist Society recommendations as judges just like every other Republican president for the past 40 years. Its one of the most consistent things he did as a Republican president. It works out great but the author trying to turn this into a “Trump” thing shows that he is either disingenuous or stupid.
And does anyone, outside of conservative media, EVER refer to “Obama-appointed” judges for some of the most absurd decisions handed down in recent years (rhetorical question)?
Actually just rubber-stamping the Federalist Society leads to squishy USSC Justices—e.g., Barrett, Gorsuch and Kavanaugh—more often than not.
Why not disingenuous AND stupid?
Seems more likely.
Both/and >> either/or in many cases.
If eyes should find TRUMP in the headline, more likely they
would stop and read. And yes, agree w/you on Trump’s judge, Trump’s executive order,etc. Funny thing, that. Just can’t recall ever seeing any reading Trump’s newly formed agency (other than our Space Force). Too many unelected go-fers in
place to add more. We need no more Tsars!
Even worse is that the reason for the court’s decision is explained only by way of refutation. The opinion though makes the essence of the ruling quite clear: “Congress’s decision to abdicate its appropriations power under the Constitution, i.e., to cede its power of the purse to the Bureau, violates the Constitution’s structural separation of powers.” The ensuing discussion of the basis for this ruling is detailed and grounded directly on the Constitution and pertinent legal and political history. And the best that this idiot reporter can manage is well, they are Trump judges.