Posted on 10/18/2022 2:26:56 PM PDT by nickcarraway
Californians might be voting with their feet, but there's nowhere they can run and hide if the federal government embraces the same policies.
During my recent trip to Phoenix, locals rolled their eyes at all the Californians who are moving there—mostly middle-class residents who are so tired of our state's chronic mismanagement that they're willing to abandon the temperate coast for a parched desert. Note to Californians: It's best to re-register your cars in other states as quickly as possible, to avoid glares from the locals.
But while the exodus continues—and California's falling population and outmigration figures reinforce the anecdotal stories—progressives still dream of replicating the state's political experiment at the national level. Californians might be voting with their feet, but there's nowhere they can run and hide if the federal government embraces the same policies.
After the Biden administration took power, many Americans expressed these concerns. After all, Vice President Kamala Harris, is a product of the Bay Area Democratic political machine. Biden tapped another former California attorney general and member of Congress, Xavier Becerra, to run the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services—a particularly important agency given the pandemic.
Other Californians rose to high-level positions, too. These include a team of economic officials with longtime California ties, including Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen (former president of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco), Small Business Administration head Isabel Casillas Guzman (a veteran of the Gray Davis and Gavin Newsom administrations), and a host of lesser-known officials.
And San Francisco's Nancy Pelosi remains the speaker of the house, where California-style policies (such as its ban on independent contracting) receive a sympathetic hearing. As we know, California's Democratic leaders seem more interested in using California—it's the world's fifth-largest economy, don't you know?—as a template for national policy.
Their recent fratricide over single-payer healthcare is one recent example. The Legislature proposed ending every private health plan and replacing it with a DMV-style bureaucracy called CalCare. Its companion measure, Assembly Constitutional Amendment 11, would have asked California voters to raise their taxes by $12,250 per household.
In reality, neither bill had any serious chance of becoming law. The effort was about making a symbolic point—largely for a national audience. But with Harris and Becerra in key national posts, progressives hoped such policies could be imposed from the top down.
Yet fears of the Californication of America are overblown after watching the administration's ongoing struggles. "White House officials have grown so frustrated with top health official Xavier Becerra as the pandemic rages on that they have openly mused about who might be better in the job," The Washington Post reported last month.
Biden officials are frustrated at conflicting messaging from Becerra's office, as the pandemic continues and the administration pays a political price for its mishandling of related health policy. By the way, a government agency that can't even get its "messaging "right on one single health issue might not be the best place to centralize all healthcare decisions, but I digress.
"Strangers on the Internet" Podcast Episode 10: A Philosopher Walks into a Bar The administration jumped into damage-control mode, as Latino groups complained about criticism of Biden's highest-ranking Latino official. But no Californian should be surprised at Becerra's inability to inspire confidence in the federal response to the virus' latest variant, or anything else. He had virtually no healthcare experience, but that was only part of the problem.
More significantly, Becerra was a disaster as attorney general. After the U.S. Senate approved Becerra as the nation's healthcare czar, this Editorial Board recounted the "ongoing mess" he left at the California Department of Justice—comparing the imagery to "an action movie protagonist barely escaping from a building that he detonated behind him."
I lack the word count to detail the myriad Becerra scandals and management failures, but the courts repeatedly slammed him for disregarding the state's police-accountability laws and mismanaging our gun-registration system. The newspaper editorial found a recurring theme: "basic incompetence." Who is shocked that he took that skill set to the federal level?
Harris' office has likewise echoed explosion scenes from Die Hard 2. White House damage control over Becerra echoes its approach to Harris in December after news reports pointed to infighting, intrigue, and dysfunction. The White House reassured the nation that the vice president is a valuable partner, but it sounded like the administration was limiting Harris to tasks where she could do little damage.
Similar dysfunction plagued all of her previous offices, so why would we expect anything different as vice president? My theory: California's Democrats rise to power in a one-party state, where internal party considerations matter more than policy credentials or basic competence, so they are out of their league playing at the national level.
California Democrats don't understand that voters in Peoria or Phoenix don't share the same obsessions as those in San Francisco or Los Angeles. So while California's lawmakers will continue along their merry, progressive way, it's obvious—and fortunate— that they lack the skills to impose those priorities on a politically diverse nation.
This column was first published in The Orange County Register.
Too eager or too dumb/pig headed to recognize the failure of California’s policies?
Why so many in the GOP-e want to follow California?
Cause Communism.
It is really very simple.
most our population, indeed the world’s population are idiots.
The smart people expend most their efforts trying to work around them.
We can’t kill them all, they have rights, but they sure are a pain in the butt.
The people whose lives aren’t negatively impacted by such policies - and consequently vote for them - are either: (a) wealthy enough to absorb it (and/or amoral regarding cultural poison) or (b) poor enough that they look to the government to underwrite their standard of living, in which case it doesn’t matter what pain is inflicted on actual taxpayers.
Yes. They have destroy our system from within while making the failure look like an inherent flaw, a systemic crash instead of sabotage. A few more .. ah shi!t…..too late.
There are literally 2 kinds of modern democrats. The first, ignorant the second are liars. That simple.
The only problem is a lot of very smart people vote for these failed policies.
That is why I do not understand “migrants” supporting demonrats. And they do. Proof? If they supported republicans the dems would have installed a 70 foot tall 10 feet thick the base 20 feet deep steel wall with a moat filled to the brim with crocodiles with patrols of pit bulls and dobermans and towers with machine gun turrets every one hundred yards unbroken from San Ysidro to Brownsville
The only successes and failures they recognize is how many votes they get.
It’s a religion to them. Whatever wackjob theory the elites in academia can dream up their sheep must follow blindly. They must also contrive the most insulting and degrading invectives to aim at rational people that won’t blindly follow. They use all manner of coercion and propaganda as peer pressure to bring in the more weak minded, and it works/ That’s why I’m just done with these types.
Lemmings.
Mostly about Harris and Becerra. Bottom line— once you manage to get into the club, you’re in— and competence has nothing to do with it. That’s life in a one party state.
“The only problem is a lot of very smart people vote for these failed policies.”
should be “The only problem is a lot of very CLEVER people vote for these failed policies.”
Smart implies moral ethics, clever Democrats generally have no moral ethics, only professional ethics.
Moral ethics never change, professional ethics change like sands on a beach.
Because some people just want to watch the world burn.
Nah...each person is a mixture of 4 types:
1) ignorant (don't know the facts)
2) stupid (can't draw the correct conclusion when facts are known)
3) insane (just make up their own facts)
4) evil (know the facts, can draw the correct conclusions, but intentionally lie to achieve their goals aanyway)
Schumer, Pelosi, etc. lean to near 100% evil
The objective is to do as much damage to the major culture as possible. That’s why.
I don’t have to and won’t take the time to read that article.
The answer is, they desire destruction of the United States for a myriad of demonic influenced reasons.
But they certainly all see it as this nation’s undoing and they’re frothing at the mouth to see it done.
They feel they’re immune from the destruction and by the time they realize how wrong they were they will regret it and regret more that it is already too late for correction. Many are brainwashed, many are directly possessed and many are simply useful idiots. Regardless, there are too many of them.
You left out Gib-me-dats. All democrats are greedy crap-heads that want stuff for free, and they'll steal it any which way they can.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.