Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: babble-on
My modest proposal is an age limit of 78 for all Senators, regardless of health or condition.

My modest proposal is an no age limit and a IQ higher than 78. Leahy would never have served in the Senate for a day let alone 48 years.

83 posted on 10/14/2022 8:30:02 AM PDT by hflynn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: hflynn; All

Repeal the 17th Amendment!

Some Freeper (and I wish I had saved it!) did research showing that prior to the 17th Amendment there were very few long-term Senate careers. Why? Prior to the 17th Amendment the Senators were selected by their respective state legislatures. They had to keep a close affinity with the needs of their states. Every state legislator or state grandee saw themselves in that seat so there was always competition for the job! (I still would not object to term limits!) The political action was home in the states - being governor for example! There were long term careers in the House - Henry Clay is a good example. Daniel Webster who served in both the House and the Senate was reluctant to leave the House when the Mass legislature made him a Senator. In his mind the power was in the House! (And that makes sense you’re closer to the money!) That being said term limits in the House does make sense! Pelosi, Nadler and others are good examples that have been there too long!


86 posted on 10/14/2022 8:43:38 AM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson