And when we stop supplying them, then what? What happens to the Ukrainians?
And please, try to make a coherent argument as to why the US taxpayer should be supplying them with guns? Why the US taxpayer should be supplying a non-NATO country with anything? Why the US taxpayer is propping up their military and government in the form of cash and equipment?
“And when we stop supplying them, then what?”
I don’t expect us to stop supplying them anytime soon. But say we do, just for fun.
Perhaps then Russia can manage to win against Ukraine, finally. And then what? Now Russia must permanently occupy their territory, and they will continually suffer losses to insurgents, just as we did in Iraq. Until Russians are tired of sending their sons to Ukraine and their sons coming back missing limbs.
And the best part is we will not need to supply any insurgency. Most of Ukraine is farmland. Farmland requires fertilizer, and fertilizer means explosives to blow up Russian occupiers. Unless Russia wants to keep those fields fallow and feed the Ukrainians from their own stockpiles, Russia will have to supply the Ukrainian insurgency themselves :)
They might lose, depending upon how much support they'd still be getting from Poland. But it is extremely unlikely that we are going to stop supplying the Ukrainians for the foreseeable future, so that doesn't much matter.